Claude
BigMoves' Pick

Claude

Claude is an AI assistant by Anthropic that helps you solve problems, write content, and code—like working with a smart colleague, not just a tool.
Pricing Model:
Follow us:
Updated: September 3, 2025

Introduction

If you're tired of AI assistants that promise the world but can't handle your actual coding challenges, Claude 4.0 might be exactly what you've been waiting for. Released by Anthropic in May 2025, this latest iteration addresses the frustrations developers face daily: inconsistent code quality, limited reasoning abilities, and tools that break down when tasks get complex. Anthropic +3

Whether you're wrestling with legacy codebases, need help with technical documentation, or want an AI that can actually follow through on multi-step programming tasks, Claude 4.0 brings some serious improvements to the table. But like any tool, it comes with both strengths and limitations you should know about before diving in.

Key Features

Hybrid Reasoning Modes set Claude 4.0 apart from its predecessors. You can choose between lightning-fast responses for simple questions or extended thinking mode for complex problems. When you activate extended thinking, Claude shows you its step-by-step reasoning process, making it easier to understand how it arrived at solutions and catch potential errors early.

Superior Coding Performance makes this release particularly exciting for developers. Claude Sonnet 4 scores 72.7% on SWE-bench, a significant jump from Claude 3.7’s 62.3%. This translates to better code generation, more accurate bug fixes, and improved ability to work with large codebases without losing context.

Parallel Tool Execution allows Claude to use multiple tools simultaneously rather than one at a time. This means faster research, better data gathering, and more efficient problem-solving when tasks require multiple resources or APIs.

Enhanced Memory Capabilities help Claude maintain context across longer conversations and projects. When given file access, Claude Opus 4 can create and maintain memory files, storing important facts and maintaining continuity across extended workflows.

Extended Thinking with Tool Use represents a beta feature that lets Claude alternate between internal reasoning and external tool usage. This creates more sophisticated problem-solving approaches, especially useful for research tasks and complex analysis.

Improved Instruction Following shows a 65% reduction in shortcut behaviors compared to Claude 3.7. This means Claude 4.0 is less likely to skip steps or find workarounds that don’t actually solve your problem.

Two Model Variants give you flexibility based on your needs. Claude Sonnet 4 balances performance with efficiency for everyday tasks, while Claude Opus 4 offers maximum capability for complex, long-running projects that require sustained attention.

Sources: Anthropic, Entelligence, Engadget +2 & DataCamp

Our Take

Claude 4.0 represents a genuine step forward in AI capabilities, particularly for developers and professionals who need reliable assistance with complex reasoning tasks. The hybrid model approach is thoughtful – you get speed when you need it and depth when complexity demands it.

The coding improvements are real and measurable. If you’re a developer, the jump from 62.3% to 72.7% on SWE-bench represents tangible benefits you’ll notice in daily work. The extended thinking feature builds trust by showing you the reasoning process, something that’s often missing in AI tools.

However, the usage limits remain a significant problem. Paying $20/month for a Pro plan only to hit limits after a few complex conversations feels restrictive, especially when you’re trying to solve real work problems. This limitation pushes many users toward competitors despite Claude’s technical advantages.

The lack of multimodal capabilities and the 200K token limit also position Claude 4.0 as a specialist tool rather than a general-purpose AI assistant. It excels in its wheelhouse but can’t match the breadth of features offered by ChatGPT or Gemini.

Here’s how we actually use Claude 4.0 in our daily workflow: we absolutely love it for copywriting because it nails brand voice better than any other AI we’ve tested. When you need content that sounds authentically human and matches your specific tone, Claude consistently delivers.

We also rely heavily on the “Projects” feature as smart backups for our automation workflows. Whether we’re generating YouTube video assets, crafting sales page copy, or creating complex automation JSON files, having those project templates saves us hours of setup time when systems need quick rebuilds or modifications.

For developers and professionals who primarily need text-based assistance with coding, writing, and analysis, Claude 4.0 offers compelling value. Just be prepared to work within its limitations and potentially supplement with other tools for broader needs.

Pros

  • Exceptional coding abilities
  • Transparent reasoning process
  • Sustained performance on complex tasks
  • Cost-effective with smart features
  • Strong safety and reliability
  • Excellent integration options

Cons

  • Restrictive usage limits
  • Limited context window
  • No multimodal capabilities
  • Inconsistent quality reports
  • Customer support issues

Pricing

Claude offers three pricing tiers to accommodate different user needs. The Free plan provides limited access to Claude 3.5 Sonnet with usage restrictions and priority access limitations. The Pro plan costs $20 per month and includes 5x more usage than the free tier, access to Claude 3 Opus and Haiku models, priority bandwidth during high-traffic periods, and early access to new features. For businesses requiring advanced capabilities, the Team plan is available at $25 per member per month with a minimum of 5 seats, offering everything in Pro plus central billing, enhanced administrative controls, and early access to new features. All paid plans can be cancelled anytime. Enterprise solutions with custom pricing are also available for organizations needing scale, security features, and dedicated support.

Final Thoughts

Claude 4.0 delivers on its promise to be a smarter, more capable AI assistant, especially for coding and complex reasoning tasks. While usage limits and missing features hold it back from being the perfect AI companion, its strengths in core areas make it worth considering for your toolkit.

If you’re primarily focused on development work, technical writing, or complex analysis, Claude 4.0’s capabilities justify working within its constraints. The free tier with Claude Sonnet 4 access gives you a risk-free way to test whether it fits your workflow.

Ready to see if Claude 4.0 can handle your toughest coding challenges? Start with the free tier at Claude.ai and experience the hybrid reasoning approach for yourself. For developers who need sustained performance on complex projects, the Pro plan unlocks Claude Opus 4’s full potential.

FAQs

What's the difference between Claude Sonnet 4 and Claude Opus 4?

Claude Sonnet 4 balances performance with efficiency, making it ideal for everyday coding tasks and high-volume applications. Claude Opus 4 is the premium model designed for complex, long-running tasks that require sustained attention and maximum capability.Sonnet 4 is available on free plans, while Opus 4 requires a paid subscription.

How much does Claude 4.0 cost compared to competitors?

Claude maintains competitive pricing at $3/$15 per million tokens for Sonnet 4 and $15/$75 for Opus 4. The Pro plan costs $20/month, similar to ChatGPT Plus, but offers access to both models. Prompt caching can reduce costs by up to 90% for repeated queries, making it more affordable for consistent usage patterns.

Can Claude 4.0 browse the internet or generate images?

No, Claude 4.0 focuses on text-based interactions and cannot browse the internet in real-time or generate images. However, it can use tools during extended thinking mode and analyze uploaded images. For web browsing and image generation, you'd need to use other AI tools alongside Claude.

Is Claude 4.0 better than ChatGPT for coding?

Claude 4.0 significantly outperforms GPT-4 on coding benchmarks, scoring 72.5% vs 54.6% on SWE-bench. For pure coding tasks, refactoring, and technical documentation, Claude generally provides better results. However, ChatGPT offers broader capabilities including web browsing, image generation, and a larger plugin ecosystem.

What are the main limitations I should know about?

The biggest concerns are restrictive usage limits (even on paid plans), a 200K token context window that's smaller than competitors, and the lack of multimodal capabilities. Customer support can also be slow to respond. These limitations make Claude 4.0 excellent for specific use cases but potentially frustrating as your primary AI assistant.

Try Claude Today

On This Page

Tutorials for Claude

No tutorials for this tool... yet!

Related Tools

Summarize Tech
Turn long YouTube videos into quick summaries.
Supertranslate
Create English subtitles from any language instantly.
Murf AI
Transform text into natural-sounding professional voiceovers.